Me, middle-aged manhood, middle-aged and elderly women

 61. One should never allow oneself to be harmed in the “Being” or the “Gots” when the future is known.  "Being" or "Gots" is considered to be non-existence as an equation, and the only way to live in it and make a profit is to be a real mysterious being.  But it seems that the reverse of the profit is also the negative, because the profit is derived from the "Existence", the "Gotting" equation or the inverse.  However, you should never allow or beg for harm.  Profit and loss surround the two edges of the "Stock", the "Stock" and separate them from each other.  The benefit can squeeze or drive away the damage as much as you want.  Usually, when a person realizes that he is a mysterious being for the benefit of others, he also inflicts harm on others in order to simply equate it with harm.  In order to avoid such congestion, one must assume that the "Goths" are the "Goths" of their inadvertent actions.  As a result, you are standing on your own, preventing others from pushing you out of your place, in your feelings and thoughts.  In fact, Reverranters or esteemed people do not retaliate through Stock feelings, thoughts and fantasies, thoughts, or the other two "Beings", "Gots" and "Gotting" as long as they stand in the moment of destiny.  Maybe nowadays, our Reverrants are available to everyone, so whoever benefits from them will have to cover the losses of another.  This damage is felt by the beneficiary from a distance, unknown to an unknown person.  In this case, the "Beneficiary" will treat the damage as if he did it himself.  As a result, the "Damage" will pass without difficulty.  In fact, you need to be able to make a profit in such a way that the Reverrant should be deceived as well.  That’s why you need to instill your “Reverant” or “Revenant” by introducing other people who don’t have these.  And these people need to share their Reverrent with you.  That’s what it’s really like to be an entrepreneur or a business.  How does someone’s harm actually work?  Let me tell you the answer from "Stock", "Bolganli".  Damage works like a paradox.  If the irony in existence is in the function of "Benefit", in the absence the paradox comes in the function of "Damage".  In "Paradox", the excess of my "stock" or "existing" feelings works to the detriment.  The “paradox” or harm imposes on me that I should not do a task by creating a memory.  He then concludes that this task still exists in the "Being", in the "Gots", in spite of its absence.  But this task is said to be no more, equal to or parallel to a pretext for the failure of the first reported failure of the action.  Then the conclusion that the paradox seems to exist between the two absences is also refuted.  "Being" or "Gotting" will continue in its path, but the lack of so many paradoxes, the hustle and bustle of lies.  In fact, the paradox does not interfere with the "Stock" and the "Existence" of feelings, but only creates a cut on the surface, covering them.  Now, tomorrow will be 62.  6 that is, I am a prophet, 2 that is, the harmony of my life with me, or middle-aged manhood.  The relativity of tomorrow, 8 is that of middle-aged and elderly women.  Mostly the girls and boys of the world will look after me tomorrow.  They are middle-aged men in the back world, a religious symbol or a parallel, or a mass of people who know what my life is like through me.  They perceive middle-aged and elderly women, or their accounts, their symbols, as a form of existence of this worldly parallel.