"We all if footer" or in russian velosiped (bicycle), I saw it as soon as I looked

 47. You know, I quote and correct these written messages from my numbers or from the calculated numbers of the day, from the daily numbers that are usually written at the beginning of my post. But usually these notes or messages, each in its own place, in relation to my daily numbers, are pre-rubbed in my brain, come to mind, or put into a writing plan. I still wonder how I made plans for this daily or daily issue. So I write down my writing plans or the messages in my head that I want to write from my previous diary, from my experience after the end of my daily writing, or even from my ordinary life, without knowing the similarities. My thirst or intention is usually to make similar statements about how to make myself comfortable. Of course, the predominance of this type of life as a speech is so obvious that life speeches, like my words or sayings, are undergoing an absolute change, with the intangible historical substantiation of events. But I didn’t try to pull out big plans or life priorities, my daily routine. So all I can say is that the next day’s ordinal numbers, or numbers, by themselves, without noticing, are the biggest similarity plan. If I hadn’t been in my previous experience 1 day ago, I wouldn’t have tried to write my next post 1 day ago and think I couldn’t do it right. I always collect my 1-day data and write it in my diary or post the next day. I consider myself to be the only source who holds the universe in my 4th world, whose behavior is as dead or science as the living, mainly due to the fact that the material form of life is made up of dead bodies. It's as if the world is shrinking, expanding, or spreading, but taking into account my different circumstances. What do I do when the world is created like this ?! My secular interpretation of myself is very broad. Through my own science, all artificial things are happening, and my world, as a globe, is vast by nature and the air is clear. It is important to emphasize that this world is not only my own, but also the abode of the dead, separated from me. Of course, I haven't been to every oil or region of the world, so I don't know how many dead copies I've witnessed. Maybe what I've seen on TV, or what I'm watching now, is enough in some ways. It is also important to acknowledge the secular significance of the fact that the historical course of events in my life is constantly evolving. This means that even if I say that there is a development of real scientific events based on secular time, these will allow events to change over time, squeezed by similarity or resonance in my existence. This means that events and happenings in existence are likened to one another or are the product of prophecy. As for the self in the being, the environment becomes more constricted and absorbs my body into a similarity or union that leaves less room for itself. As a result, I can move or feel myself clearly and in advance. I allow the dead to spread this kind of self, but I can’t create an explanatory process. So I use a different method in order to understand the prophecy. My son Abraham will be the next prophet after me. For me, Ibrahim is the sultan of words or phrases, the property of words. Going with those words, I know that I am the first vocabulary to look at 5.5 out of six as Abraham. But the realm of the dead, the people of the dead, is the number 0, denoting the number 6, or the most inverted or contradictory position to myself. So, for the dead, out of fear, for me, I, as a hero, use my culture of speech, my words, to test the prophecies of the dead in the first place. Abraham makes prophecies in my conversations in my language, giving me the closest and most understandable way of speaking, the way of speaking. Now I am amazed. Do I quote the ordinal numbers of my days, or do these quotes also quote my writings on a piece of paper? Anyway, at least I didn't go down without explaining myself first. In this plan, my answer to the question of what is writing and what is the culture of oral speech lies. It is no exaggeration to say that the writing is dead, and the oral is either myself or any of the prophets. Underneath the writing, the dead give me the meaning they want to convey to me in some way, regardless of the form of the writing. But through the forms of my writing, through each set of letters with a clear structure, I can make these constrained meanings resemble, from chaotic to order or resonant. As a result, their writings, which have passed through me, are seen as a way of prophecy for them. Arranged or resonant meanings, whether collected or collected, certainly unite in large groups, simplifying their common actions for the dead. I know the future of our world through these writings. I know in advance that this popular urgency is what all the major generalized or combined directions are looking at. In any case, for me, such worldly issues or events are immediately apparent or tempted to get stuck in my life. As soon as I turn on the TV, the most important information appears in the form of events. And in my speech, I talk a lot about the meaning, that is, I form the meaning. But the dead in the living try to put these meanings in order or to classify them. That's why, in a way, they're shaping my future based on what I'm saying. By resonating the Sanskrit, the murmur of my speech or speech, they create the desired event in the future and say it like this. When I determine the future of the world by putting pressure on the world through my experiences in my speech culture, the people of the world or the dead avoid the new events that take place in my existence through the change of memories in every little moment of time. -existently or spontaneously.